The Lord Says?
When We Say, “The Lord Says”: Prophecy, Confidence, and Discernment
When We Say, “The Lord Says”: Prophecy, Confidence, and Discernment
There has been a lot of discussion in some Christian circles about whether people should say things like “the Lord says,” “God says,” or “the Holy Spirit says” when giving a prophetic word. I understand the concern behind that caution. We have all seen situations where someone used the name of God to give extra weight to a personal opinion, and that can be manipulative and damaging. No one should use prophetic language carelessly.
At the same time, I think we need to be careful that our concern about misuse does not push us into a position that Scripture itself does not support. The question should not simply be whether strong prophetic language makes us uncomfortable. The real question is whether the Bible allows people to identify God as the source of a prophetic word.
When we look at the Old Testament, the answer is obvious. Prophets regularly spoke with phrases like “This is what the LORD says,” or introduced a message as the word of the Lord. That language was meant to identify the source. The prophet was not merely offering insight or personal wisdom. He was saying that the message came from God.
Of course, we cannot simply take every Old Testament prophetic practice and assume it carries over into the New Testament in exactly the same way. We still have to ask whether something continues, changes, or is set aside as revelation unfolds. But when we ask that question here, something important stands out. The New Testament never tells believers that identifying God as the source of prophetic speech is no longer appropriate. More than that, the New Testament continues to use the same basic kind of language.
In Acts 21:11, Agabus gives a prophetic word and introduces it with the phrase, “The Holy Spirit says.” That is direct language. He does not say that he has a feeling, a possibility, or an impression that might be worth considering. He understands the message as something the Holy Spirit is communicating.
We see something similar in Acts 13:1–3. The church at Antioch is worshiping and fasting when the Holy Spirit gives direction concerning Barnabas and Saul. Luke simply presents the event as the Holy Spirit speaking. There is no hesitation in the text about identifying God as the source of the message.
The same kind of language appears in Revelation 2–3, where the churches are repeatedly told to hear what the Spirit says to the churches. So this is more than an argument from silence. The New Testament does not merely fail to prohibit phrases like “the Lord says.” It gives us examples where the Holy Spirit is directly identified as the source of what is being spoken.
That matters. It means we should be cautious about creating a rule that the New Testament itself does not create.
There is an important difference between saying that prophetic speech comes from God and saying that every person who uses the words “the Lord says” must therefore be speaking infallibly. The phrase identifies the claimed source of the message. It does not remove the word from discernment.
That is where the New Testament gives us a safeguard that needs to stay in place.
Paul makes this very clear in 1 Corinthians 14:29. He tells the church that two or three prophets should speak, and that the others should weigh carefully what is said. That gives us a healthy picture of how prophecy should function in the church. The prophet speaks what he or she believes God has given, and the church weighs the word.
That is quite different from saying that a prophet should never speak with confidence. It is also quite different from saying that once someone claims God has spoken, everyone else must accept the message without question. The New Testament leaves room for confidence and requires discernment at the same time.
I think this is where we sometimes confuse humility with uncertainty. We can act as though the only humble way to give a prophetic word is to soften it until almost nothing is being claimed. A person may genuinely believe the Holy Spirit has shown them something, but they feel pressure to say, “Maybe this is from God,” or, “I do not know if this means anything, but...”
There are certainly times when that kind of language is appropriate. If someone is unsure, they should say so. There is nothing wrong with being honest about the level of confidence we have. But if a person genuinely believes the Holy Spirit has spoken, it is not automatically arrogant to say that. The New Testament prophets were not embarrassed to identify the source of what they were saying.
The real safeguard is not that prophetic words must always sound uncertain. The safeguard is that prophetic words must be discerned.
We see this clearly in 1 Thessalonians 5:19–22. Paul tells believers not to quench the Spirit and not to treat prophecies with contempt, but he also tells them to test what is spoken and hold on to what is good. That is a very grounded way to approach prophetic ministry. We should not become so afraid of error that we shut down what the Spirit may want to say, but neither should we become so impressed with prophetic language that we stop testing what we hear.
This also means the responsibility for discernment should not rest only on the person receiving the prophecy. Sometimes we treat prophetic ministry like a private transaction. Someone gives another person a word and then says, in effect, “You will have to decide whether that is from God.”
Of course, the person receiving the word has a responsibility to pray and seek the Lord. They should not turn off their own discernment. But Paul’s instruction is broader than that. In 1 Corinthians 14:29, the others are told to weigh what is said. Prophecy belongs in the life of the church, and the church shares responsibility for discerning what has been spoken.
That kind of shared discernment is not a sign that we doubt the Holy Spirit. It is part of the way Paul tells us to handle what the Spirit may be saying.
This becomes especially important when a prophetic word carries significant direction. If someone receives a word about moving, taking a ministry position, leaving a church, marrying someone, changing jobs, giving away a large amount of money, or making another major life decision, that word should be taken seriously and weighed carefully. God can certainly give direction through prophecy, but the New Testament does not present prophetic direction as something that operates outside of wise and mature discernment.
Acts 13:1–3 is a good example. The Holy Spirit gives very specific direction concerning Barnabas and Saul, and that direction has enormous consequences. But notice the setting. The church is worshiping, fasting, and seeking God together. Prophets and teachers are present. The word is received in the middle of a community that is already listening to the Lord together.
That is a very different picture from someone receiving a prophetic word in isolation and feeling pressured to make a major life decision because another person said, “God told me.” The more significant the direction, the more important it is that the word be weighed by mature believers. That is not unbelief. It is wisdom, and it fits the New Testament pattern.
Acts 21:10–14 gives us another important insight. Agabus gives Paul a prophetic warning about what will happen to him in Jerusalem. The people who hear the prophecy respond by urging Paul not to go. Paul, however, continues toward Jerusalem.
That passage reminds us that receiving revelation and understanding exactly how to apply it are not always the same thing. God may reveal something accurately, while people still draw the wrong conclusion about what should be done in response. The prophetic word may be right, but our interpretation or application of it may still need discernment.
That is one of the reasons the church needs more than prophetic sensitivity. We also need wisdom. Sometimes the question is not only, “Did God speak?” The next question is, “What does this mean, and what should we do with it?” Those questions are related, but they are not identical.
This is also why prophetic words must remain under the authority of Scripture. The Bible is the final authority for what the church believes and how believers live. Prophecy does not replace Scripture, add to Scripture, or stand beside Scripture as another source of doctrine. A prophetic word that contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture should be rejected, no matter how confident or spiritual the person giving it may sound.
We should also understand that saying, “the Lord says,” does not remove a word from discernment. In fact, I would say the stronger the claim, the more willing the person giving the word should be to have it tested. If I believe God has spoken through me, I should not be threatened when mature believers weigh what I have said. That process is not an attack on prophecy. It is part of the New Testament pattern for prophecy.
A healthy prophetic culture should make room for people to hear God, speak faithfully, and remain accountable at the same time. It should not force people to sound uncertain when they genuinely believe the Holy Spirit has spoken, but neither should it allow prophetic language to become a tool for control.
There are two mistakes we need to avoid. One is making prophecy so vague that no one is ever really claiming that God has said anything. The other is making prophecy so untouchable that once someone says, “the Lord says,” no one is allowed to question or weigh the message. Neither one reflects the New Testament very well.
The better path is to believe that the Holy Spirit still speaks, to allow people to identify His voice when they genuinely believe He has spoken, and then to take seriously the responsibility of the church to discern what has been said. That combination gives room for both confidence and humility without turning either one into a performance.
We can be confident that God speaks without pretending that every impression is infallible. We can welcome prophecy without surrendering discernment. We can honor the work of the Holy Spirit while still holding every prophetic word under the authority of Scripture and within the wisdom of the body of Christ.
I believe that is a more faithful way to handle prophetic ministry. It takes God’s voice seriously, and it takes our responsibility to discern seriously too.